What It’s Like to Be a Waterbomber

Diving into burning canyons with Tanker 47

This story originally ran on January 16, 2025, in New York magazine.

Tanker 47 rears up as helicopter pilot Darren Davies settles it to hover over the Encino Reservoir, a half-mile-wide artificial lake perched on the shoulder of a hill overlooking the San Fernando Valley. He holds steady a dozen feet over the water as the flight mechanic in back, John Trivellin, lowers a 23-foot-long retractable snorkel into the reservoir.

“Tanker 47, we’re in the dip,” co-pilot Pablo Montero calls over the radio.

It’s 9.30 p.m. on Saturday, January 11, and the crew is on its third night working the Palisades fire, a Godzilla of a blaze that has already scorched more than 20,000 acres, killed five people, and annihilated more than 5,000 homes and other structures. The fire is less than 15 percent contained.

Davies’s infrared goggles turn the night into day, rendering the sprawling lights of the Valley below like a galaxy. In front sits a yellow rubber duck, a sort of mascot, jiggling atop the control panel from the vibrations of two massive sets of triple-rotor blades whirling overhead, each weighing 360 pounds. Radio frequencies for different fires are scrawled in black Sharpie on the inside of the windscreen in front of Montero, who handles most communications.

The Chinook is a beast, a 99-foot-long, 25-ton machine originally designed for humping troops and weapons around the battlefield, now repurposed for a different kind of war. It’s more than twice as big as the Black Hawk, its most famous cousin, and twice as long as a semi trailer when counting its 60-foot rotors. Inside Tanker 47’s cargo bay sits a 3,000-gallon tank, roughly equivalent to six hot tubs. While it’s not a vast amount in absolute terms, a helicopter can drop the water precisely, and all at once, which can halt the advance of even a large fire.

Within seconds, Davies can feel the aircraft grow heavier as the snorkel drinks from the reservoir and he throttles up the twin 5,000-horsepower turbine engines to compensate. In less than two minutes, the helicopter has taken on ten tons of water.

Continue reading What It’s Like to Be a Waterbomber

Keep Calm and Drone On

Drone swarms are coming. Don’t panic. They’re bringing that stuff you ordered.

This article first appeared in Sherwood News on January 14, 2025.

Do you have a sneaking suspicion that an unmanned vehicle is hovering over your house? The odds that you’re right are growing fast. And that drone might just be bringing you a hamburger.

In more than a dozen locations across the US, fleets of autonomous vehicles are zipping through the sky, summoned by customers seeking convenience and a touch of novelty. These battery-powered vessels are delivering food, medicine, and other small consumer goods, often within 30 minutes of an order being placed, and they do so almost noiselessly, without adding any traffic to roads or carbon emissions to the atmosphere.

Some of America’s biggest retailers are behind the surge, and the plan is to push toward ubiquity over the next 5 to 10 years. “Between Amazon, Walmart, DoorDash, and Uber Eats, you’re going to see 100,000 or 200,000 autonomous robots operating in the lower part of the airspace,” Andreas Raptopoulos, CEO of the drone-delivery startup Matternet, said. “It will be a profound transformation of how things work.” 

Delivery drones have been simmering on the back burner for years now. They broke into public consciousness back in 2013 when Jeff Bezos revealed on “60 Minutes” that AmazonAMZN $218.12 (-0.31%) was experimenting with bringing small packages to customers using uncrewed aircraft. 

Then things went quiet. Apart from a few test projects here and there, neither Amazon nor anyone else seemed to be making much progress. The problems were many. For one thing, drones were noisy, slow, and had limited range. For another, communities balked at the prospect of being swarmed by what sounded like giant mosquitos.

Most of all, what was holding drone delivery back was regulation. The Federal Aviation Administration is responsible for every form of civilian aircraft that flies in the US airspace, and while it’s an enthusiastic supporter of using that airspace profitably, it’s also extremely serious about protecting the public from danger. 

As Amazon and others developed their vehicles, the FAA maintained strict rules over their operation. In particular, it mandated that each vehicle had to be controlled by a single dedicated operator who maintained a line of sight on the craft at all times.

Continue reading Keep Calm and Drone On

The New Threat to Los Angeles Firefighters: Drones

Aerial gawkers are getting in the way.

This article originally ran in New York magazine on January 10, 2025.

Aerial firefighting is already one of the most dangerous kinds of aviation there is. Pilots must maneuver heavy, sluggish planes over rough terrain at low altitude, often amid severe turbulence and poor visibility. Now aerial firefighters battling the Los Angeles wildfires are facing an additional danger: illegal drones. On Thursday a “Super Scooper” plane fighting the Palisade fire collided with a drone that tore a hole in its wing, forcing it to land and taking a powerful weapon out of the fight when it was urgently needed.

In the aftermath the FAA promised severe punishment for anyone caught flying drones in a way that interferes with firefighting, with penalties of up to 12 months in prison and $75,000 in fines. But the uncomfortable reality is that there is little that authorities can do to prevent illegal drone flights, as this incident and the recent New Jersey drone swarm panic both demonstrate.

Thursday’s accident occurred as firefighters struggled to contain a blaze that had consumed more than 17,000 acres, though it was spreading less aggressively thanks to a temporary lull in the winds. The aircraft, a twin-engine CL-415, is a Canadian-built amphibious aircraft designed specifically for aerial firefighting. It can skim along the surface of a lake or ocean and scoop up 1,600 gallons of water at a time, allowing it to carry out many sorties in a short interval since it doesn’t have to return to an airport to refill. A picture posted online by the L.A. County Fire Department showed a fist-size hole in the leading edge of the plane’s left wing. According to reporting by the WarZone, the incident led to the temporary grounding of all aircraft tasked to the Palisades fire.

Continue reading The New Threat to Los Angeles Firefighters: Drones

How Do You Stop a Hurricane Made of Fire?

California fights wildfires like wars, but this one may be unwinnable.

This article originally ran on January 9, 2025 in New York magazine.

Walls of flames pushed by hurricane-force winds are devouring the Los Angeles basin, leveling whole neighborhoods and overwhelming firefighters. The water streaming from fire hydrants slows to a trickle. Ash rains down over the tens of thousands fleeing their homes, masked against the choking smoke. For Angelenos watching their city burn, there is no prior experience that can help them grasp the scale of what is happening. As a friend texted me from Hollywood, “This may be the biggest wildfire disaster in world history.”

The scale of the destruction is all the more dismaying given how assiduously California has prepared itself to combat wildfires. The state’s Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, better known as CAL FIRE, spends $4 billion a year on prevention and mitigation. Over the last decade that money has allowed it to assemble an army-like force of unprecedented sophistication and scale, with a staff of 12,000 and an aerial firefighting fleet larger than most countries’ air forces.

Yet in the face of some of the worst fire conditions in over a decade, it hasn’t been enough. Though some 9,000 firefighters were on hand to battle this week’s blazes, they were overwhelmed by the multiple wildfires that moved at hundreds of yards per minute. “We don’t have enough fire personnel in L.A. County between all the departments to handle this,” L.A. County fire chief Anthony Marrone told the L.A. Times on Wednesday.

The problem wasn’t only a shortage of manpower. Even the most formidable human efforts are useless when bone-dry undergrowth is whipped by the strongest winds the area has experienced in years, with gusts up to 100 mph. “When that wind is howling like that, nothing’s going to stop that fire,” says Wayne Coulson, CEO of the aerial firefighting company Coulson Aviation that’s battling the fires. “You just need to get out of the way.”

The winds slackened Wednesday night and on Thursday morning, helping firefighters gain the upper hand against some of the infernos. The city’s fire chief announced on Thursday that the Woodley fire in the San Fernando Valley had been brought under control and that firefighters had made gains against the Sunset fire threatening Hollywood. But other fires still burned out of control and further danger loomed. According to the National Weather Service, humidity remains dangerously low and gusty winds of up to 70 mph are expected between Thursday night and Friday evening. By Thursday morning, five major fires were still burning and tens of thousandsof people were under evacuation orders. Warned the NWS: “Any new wildfires that develop will likely spread rapidly.”

Continue reading How Do You Stop a Hurricane Made of Fire?

OpenAI is Intel

This article originally ran in Sherwood News on December 26, 2024.

In 1959, physicist Robert Noyce and his colleagues at the Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation created a nifty little piece of technology: a wafer of silicon with an entire electronic circuit printed on it. As a technical breakthrough, it was an impressively clever feat, but what made Noyce’s achievement historically important was the cascade of innovations that followed. By making it possible to progressively shrink computing power into smaller and cheaper packages, the integrated circuit gave rise to wave after wave of transformative products, from the pocket calculator to the personal computer, the internet, and mobile computing. It’s no exaggeration to say that Noyce’s invention engendered the entire digital world as we know it today.

Noyce and some of his collaborators left Fairchild to form their own company, IntelINTC $19.92 (-2.41%), in 1968. Like OpenAI today, Intel had a head start on a new field of almost unlimited promise, and it used its advantage to great effect. In 1971 the company invented the microprocessor chip, a development that would later enable personal computers to bring the information age into homes of retail consumers. In 1997, Time magazine named Intel CEO Andrew Grove its Man of the Year. By 2000, the company had a market cap of $250 billion and ranked as the sixth-most-valuable business in the world.

That, however, proved to be the company’s high-water mark. In the years that followed, the company learned that being present at the birth of a technology and riding it to great heights doesn’t automatically mean that you’ll be able to sniff out market trends and outcompete newcomers indefinitely. In 1999, NvidiaNVDA $138.46 (0.28%), a much smaller rival, began shipping its first graphics processing unit, or GPU. In the decade to come, these chips would prove essential to the growth of PC gaming and multimedia applications, and then proved equally vital to both cryptocurrency mining and the large language models that power OpenAI. This time it was Nvidia, not Intel, whose chips were powering the revolution, and the changing of the guard was reflected in the company’s share prices. Ten years ago, Intel’s market cap was 15x bigger than Nvidia’s; today Nvidia’s is 30x bigger.

Investor Warren Buffett famously once said that he likes to invest in companies whose business has an “economic moat” around it — some factor, whether brand strength, network effects, patents, or economies of scale, that prevents rivals from swooping in and poaching its business. A head start in a technology can function as a moat for a while. But success inevitably draws rivals, and sooner or later some of them will catch up, or the demands of the market will change and favor a different technology. For now, OpenAI has a first-mover advantage in machine learning, and it has every reason to be optimistic about its fortunes in the years ahead. But if history is any guide, its halcyon days will eventually go the way of all flesh.

5 Unanswered Questions About the South Korea Plane Crash

This article originally ran in New York magazine on December 30, 2024.

The Jeju Air 737 crash in South Korea on Sunday that killed all but two of the people onboard was in many respects as baffling as it was tragic. Given the scant information currently available, it’s hard even to piece together a coherent picture of what happened. “There’s a lot more questions than there are answers,” says Jim Brauchle, an aviation attorney who flew transport planes in the U.S. Air Force and now investigates air crashes as part of his law practice.

What we do know is that the plane was inbound from Bangkok, Thailand, to Muan, South Korea, with 175 passengers and six crew members when it apparently flew into a flock of birds and sucked at least one into an engine as it came in to land. Video taken from the ground appears to show a puff of smoke coming from the plane’s right engine, signaling a compressor stall that would have caused the engine to lose some if not all of its thrust.

The flight crew declared an emergency and aborted the landing. Around this time, the plane stopped transmitting its speed and location data via an automatic system called ADS-B, which lets the plane be tracked on websites like FlightRadar24. At the moment of its final transmission, the plane was a mile and half from the approach end of the runway and about 500 feet above the surface.

Continue reading 5 Unanswered Questions About the South Korea Plane Crash

Mysterious Drone Swarms Won’t Always Be This Weird

This article originally ran on Saturday, December 14, 2024 in New York magazine.

“Is it frustrating to not have more answers on this?” New Jersey governor Phil Murphy mused on Wednesday, as his state buzzed with consternation over a weeks-long run of unexplained drone sightings. “Is it frustrating to not have a source for these things? Yes.”

The widespread agita is less about the danger these mysterious vehicles might pose than officials’ exasperating inability to figure out who’s operating them and why. It seems like the problem shouldn’t be that hard to solve. For decades the U.S. has maintained an elaborate air-defense system that can detect and intercept everything from supersonic bombers to ballistic missiles. So what’s so tough about a handful of buzzing, low altitude drones that for all we know might have come off the shelf at Best Buy?

It turns out that the problem is way harder than it seems like it should be, and the problem has been repeating for years with no obvious solution in sight. On the contrary, there’s every expectation that the problem could get considerably more widespread in years to come. Basically, if you think this is weird, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

The first great drone-swarm mystery to capture the public imagination happened five years ago, when residents of Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas began to report unidentified craft appearing overhead in large numbers at the start of 2020. Residents reported that drones were lighting up the sky “with Christmas lights” and “zipping around all over the place.” I visited the area and dropped in on Rick Bain, a retired power-plant operator who took me into his backyard and showed me where he’d seen a craft hovering for several minutes. “It was right over the house, about 300 or 400 feet up in the air, barely moving,” he told me. “Probably five or six feet across, definitely not big enough to be any kind of manned thing.” His account seemed sober and credible. But drone-swarm skeptics abounded. Vice headlined one report “Mass Panic: It’s Not Clear That Colorado’s Mystery Drones Even Exist.” The visitations stopped shortly before COVID hit, and suddenly everyone had something more obviously dangerous to worry about.

Continue reading Mysterious Drone Swarms Won’t Always Be This Weird

How Luigi Mangione Probably Gave Himself Away

This article originally ran on Tuesday, December 10, 2024 in New York magazine.

Former FBI agent Jerry Clark served six years on the Cincinnati division’s violent-crime fugitive task force and was later the lead investigator on the notorious “Pizza Bomber” murder case. Today, he’s a professor of criminology at Gannon University in Erie, Pennsylvania, and the co-author of four books, including On the Lam: A History of Hunting Fugitives in America. We talked to him about the manhunt for Luigi Mangione, who allegedly fled from Manhattan after gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on December 4.

How does law enforcement go about apprehending a fugitive?
You start out with, “What do we know happened?” Then you start to piece together how he got to the scene and where he went after he left, and you start searching for imagery. We call it canvassing. In the digital age, every business has a camera, every person has a camera in their pocket. So you’ll canvass and follow the trail of where the last known sighting was.

It takes hours and hours of painstaking police work to get those videos. They don’t just appear. You’ve got to go find them. I used to even look at people riding on the bus. If there’s a bus route near where the suspect was last seen, you find the bus driver who was working that shift and ask if they have any regular customers, then put out a note asking anybody that was riding this bus at this time to give you a call. It’s all just hard gruntwork.

And then you go through hours of footage. Once you have a clear image, you put it out over the media as quickly as possible to get the help of the public. You’re creating digital billboards so that everybody gets to see this face. Now you’ve got millions of investigators.

Continue reading How Luigi Mangione Probably Gave Himself Away

How Trump Will Change America This Time

This article originally ran in New York magazine on December 6, 2024.

Those expecting a continuation of Donald Trump’s first term are in for a shock. Back then, he came to office with no experience governing and no understanding of the machinery through which he could implement his will. Over time, he learned and then spent the next four years stewing in resentment and plotting revenge. “In the first term, things were chaotic. Trump did not achieve most of his policy goals, and mostly the institutions survived. They took some damage, but mostly they held up reasonably well,” says Don Moynihan, a professor of public policy at Georgetown University. “I think that is not going to be true for the second term.”

When he comes to power in January, he will have the benefit of a judiciary stocked with his own appointees, not least in the Supreme Court, which this summer decided a president has immunity from criminal prosecution for anything he does in an official capacity. What’s more, Trump will be abetted by a unified Congress held by a party that is more compliant than before. “The checks will not be there,” says Steven Levitsky, a professor of political science at Harvard and co-author of How Democracies Die. “This is going to be a much more authoritarian government.”

One of his first moves will be to carry out a massive purge of the officials who might stand in his way. Trump plans to reclassify some 50,000 civil servants so that he can fire them at will. He has already signaled that he intends to axe the head of the FBI, Christopher Wray, whom Trump himself appointed in 2017 and who has a ten-year term set by Congress in order to insulate the bureau from partisan politics.

Trump’s power, though, will not be limitless.

Continue reading How Trump Will Change America This Time

The CEO Shooting Has Corporate America Panicking

This article originally ran in New York magazine on December 6, 2024.

As soon as the manhunt for the killer of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson got underway, the security and risk-consultancy firm Kroll started getting calls from its clients. As the the head of enterprise security risk management, Matthew Dumpert’s job is to protect executives and wealthy individuals from a wide variety of threats, including violence. I spoke to him the day after the attack about the public reaction to the vigilante-style killing and whether the shooting is a wake-up call for corporate America.

What have the calls been like since the shooting? What are your clients saying?
There’s been a real steady flow of phone calls, emails, and text messages from our clients wondering, “What does this mean? Is this a new evolution, or is this just an expansion of the existing threat environment? What do we need to do?” People are recognizing that in corporate America, life is very different than it was two days ago.

Why is it different?
A lot of executives’ eyes have been opened to the notion that even if you think you’re flying under the radar, there could be individuals or groups out there conspiring against you. To see this attack unfold in such a cold and clinical manner, it rocks the soul. It really captured how vulnerable we are as individuals.

Continue reading The CEO Shooting Has Corporate America Panicking